No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Mitchell P. (2021). “EMODnet Geology – WP3 Case Study Exploring the suitability of historic datasets to produce robust quantitative sediment maps” Retrieved from: <nowiki>https://www.emodnet-geology.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Mitchell-2021_WP3-Cefas-Case-Study_V1.pdf</nowiki>, accessed on 2022-02-17. | Mitchell P. (2021). “EMODnet Geology – WP3 Case Study Exploring the suitability of historic datasets to produce robust quantitative sediment maps” Retrieved from: <nowiki>https://www.emodnet-geology.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Mitchell-2021_WP3-Cefas-Case-Study_V1.pdf</nowiki>, accessed on 2022-02-17. | ||
[[Sediments#tab%3DNorth%20Sea|'''Return to North Sea Sediments page.''']] | [[Sediments#tab%3DNorth%20Sea|'''Return to North Sea Sediments page.''']] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:10, 15 March 2022
Emodnet geology uses the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954; Long, 2006), which refers to sand as having particles from 0.063mm to 2 mm (Mitchell P., 2021).
Source:
Mitchell P. (2021). “EMODnet Geology – WP3 Case Study Exploring the suitability of historic datasets to produce robust quantitative sediment maps” Retrieved from: https://www.emodnet-geology.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Mitchell-2021_WP3-Cefas-Case-Study_V1.pdf, accessed on 2022-02-17.
This page was last edited on 15 March 2022, at 12:10. Content is available under GPLv3 unless otherwise noted.
Co-funded by the European Union.