No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
=Baltic Sea = | =Baltic Sea = | ||
Country Pink has a | Country Pink has a relatively small but in several ways vital marine presence in the Baltic Sea. The majority of vessels going in and out of the Baltic Sea from and to the North Sea go through this country's EEZ. IMO always keeps an eye on this country's area, since there are only a very limited number of suitable commercial shipping routes through it. The many many islands that also make up this country introduce a rather unique ecosystem, and a unique dynamic of passenger and fishing vessels (commercial and private) throughout the entire EEZ. The country also has a presence in the North Sea, so it can use both its Baltic and North Sea areas to try to pursue its marine and maritime ambitions. | ||
The country's government wants to further grow in renewable energy. It is already one of the most progressive countries in the world in this sector, really an 'early adopter', and the government wants this to stay that way. Simultaneously, the government wants to explore other new sustainable 'blue growth' sectors, notably offshore aquaculture. Given the shallow, still salty sea and abundance of islands, the unique ecosystem in this country's EEZ needs to be better protected, according to the government. | |||
Consequently, the government is looking for a scenario where offshore renewable energy areas are increased substantially in the short and medium term. Shipping traffic going in and out of the entire Baltic Sea has limited and well-established routes that need to be maintained, in the eyes of this country's government. A significant increase in suitable, meaningful marine protected areas as well as aquaculture sites need to occur. The country's strong commercial fishing industry has so far been content, but is under pressure because of all of this, of which the government is of course very aware. | |||
More internationally, the country needs to be mindful of EU policies concerning marine protected areas and commercial fishing. It is a member state, after all. The IMO routes established in this country's area is a point of international concern too. | |||
=Adriatic Sea= | =Adriatic Sea= | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
To that end, the country is looking for a scenario where marine tourism sites of all sorts are (further) defined in the middle of the country's sea area relatively close to shore. Meanwhile, the country is looking for offshore wind farm areas meaningfully and safely combined with oil and gas areas further north. What to do with all the marine protected areas the EU is looking for...? Can't that be combined with marine tourism? As long it it doesn't interfere with commercial fishing... | To that end, the country is looking for a scenario where marine tourism sites of all sorts are (further) defined in the middle of the country's sea area relatively close to shore. Meanwhile, the country is looking for offshore wind farm areas meaningfully and safely combined with oil and gas areas further north. What to do with all the marine protected areas the EU is looking for...? Can't that be combined with marine tourism? As long it it doesn't interfere with commercial fishing... | ||
Internationally, the country needs to be conscious of its still young relationship with the EU and NATO. The relationship is quite excellent, yes, but the country still has to prove itself a bit. Tourism is all fine, also EU politicians enjoy visiting this country, but at what cost? The EU is keeping an eye on this country...<headertabs /> | Internationally, the country needs to be conscious of its still young relationship with the EU and NATO. The relationship is quite excellent, yes, but the country still has to prove itself a bit. Tourism is all fine, also EU politicians enjoy visiting this country, but at what cost? The EU is keeping an eye on this country... | ||
= Eastern Mediterranean Sea = | |||
Nestled along the Mediterranean and Red Sea, country Pink strategically utilizes its maritime presence for economic and environmental pursuits. Despite historical challenges, the nation is poised to leverage marine spatial planning as a cornerstone for sustainable development. Pink's maritime sectors have evolved, emphasizing responsible resource management. Advances in marine technology, fisheries regulation, and coastal tourism showcase the nation's commitment to balancing economic interests with environmental conservation. | |||
Within its coastal expanse, Pink addresses the intricate task of coordinating diverse maritime activities. The government navigates challenges such as preserving marine biodiversity, ensuring sustainable fishing practices, and fostering a thriving maritime economy, all while safeguarding the ecological integrity of its coastal regions. | |||
In conclusion, Pink aspires to be a trailblazer in responsible marine spatial planning, setting a precedent for sustainable maritime practices that harmonize economic progress with environmental conservation.<headertabs /> |
Latest revision as of 09:46, 15 November 2023
This page was last edited on 15 November 2023, at 09:46. Content is available under GPLv3 unless otherwise noted.